United Kingdom
Catalog   /   TVs & Video   /   TVs

Comparison Samsung QE-65QN85D 65 " vs Samsung QE-65QN95D 65 "

Add to comparison
Samsung QE-65QN85D 65 "
Samsung QE-65QN95D 65 "
Samsung QE-65QN85D 65 "Samsung QE-65QN95D 65 "
Compare prices 8Compare prices 7
User reviews
0
0
0
2
TOP sellers
Pantone certification. Integrated SmartThings hub, Matter compatible, Zigbee/Thread module. Q-Symphony technology for synchronizing TV sound with a soundbar. AI sound optimization. Light sensor. Creating HDR from SDR using AI.
Processor with 20 neural networks. Improves image depth by increasing the contrast of foreground objects. AI adjusts the image to different types of content being viewed.
Pantone certification. Integrated SmartThings hub, Matter compatible, Zigbee/Thread module. Q-Symphony technology for synchronizing TV sound with a soundbar. AI sound optimization. Light sensor. Creating HDR from SDR using AI.
Processor with 20 neural networks. Improves image depth by increasing the contrast of foreground objects. AI adjusts the image to different types of content being viewed.
Size65 "65 "
Operating systemSmart TV (proprietary system)Smart TV (proprietary system)
CPUSamsung NQ4 AI Gen2Samsung NQ4 AI Gen2
Display
MatrixQLEDQLED
Backlight typeMini LEDMini LED
Screen surfaceglossanti-glare
Resolution3840x2160 px3840x2160 px
Upscalingup to 4Kup to 4K
Frame rate100 Hz100 Hz
HDR supportHDR10+HDR10+
Brightness / contrast enhancement
Black enhancement
AMD compatibleAMD FreeSync Premium ProAMD FreeSync Premium Pro
Multimedia
Sound power40 W70 W
Number of speakers26
Subwoofer
Audio decodersDolby AtmosDolby Atmos
Digital tuner
DVB-T2 (terrestrial)
DVB-C (cable)
DVB-S2 (satellite)
DVB-T2 (terrestrial)
DVB-C (cable)
DVB-S2 (satellite)
Picture-in-picture
Features
Features
AirPlay
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Miracast
Bluetooth v 5.2
voice control
Amazon Alexa
Google Assistant
Bixby
AirPlay
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Miracast
Bluetooth v 5.2
voice control
Amazon Alexa
Google Assistant
Bixby
Connectors
HDMI44
HDMI versionv 2.1v 2.1
HDMI technologiesALLM, eARC, CEC, VRRALLM, eARC, CEC, VRR
Additional inputs
USB x2
LAN
USB x2
LAN
Outputs
optical
optical
General
Wall mountVESA 400x300 mmVESA 400x300 mm
Stand shape1 leg on the platform1 leg on the platform
Power consumption102 W96 W
Energy efficiency class (new)FF
Dimensions (WxHxD)1447x890x259 mm1444x890x271 mm
Dimensions without stand (WxHxD)1447x830x46 mm1444x829x21 mm
Weight26.8 kg27.9 kg
Color
Added to E-Catalogapril 2024april 2024
Glossary

Screen surface

The type of coating used on the TV screen.

Matte. Historically, the first type of coating for LCD screens, which is often found today. Screens with such a coating generally have average characteristics of brightness, saturation and colour reproduction quality, in terms of these indicators they are inferior to glossy counterparts. However, the matte coating has one important advantage: it has virtually no glare from ambient light. In some situations, this can be an important advantage — for example, if the TV is installed opposite the window. And for some users it is more pleasant to look at the screen without glare, albeit relatively dim.

Glossy. A coating designed to improve the brightness and colour quality of the visible image compared to matte screens. The creators have managed to achieve this goal: "glossy" screens really provide rich, vibrant colours and a brighter image. The key disadvantage of such screens is the appearance of glare from ambient light on them — this can ruin the whole viewing experience. Because of this, the classic glossy coating is practically not used today, anti-glare solutions have taken its place (see below).

Glossy (anti-glare). Modification of the glossy coating, created, as the name implies, in order to eliminate the main drawback of the classic gloss — glare from external lighting. This is not to say th...at such screens do not glare at all, but there are much less reflections on them than on ordinary glossy ones. As for the image quality, it is at least not much worse, and often even better (especially since such coatings are constantly being improved). Thanks to all this, most modern TVs of all price categories are equipped with anti-glare screens.

Sound power

The nominal power of the sound produced by the TV's sound system.

The larger the screen and the greater the estimated distance to the viewer, the more powerful the sound system must be in order to be heard normally. Manufacturers take this moment into account, moreover, most often they also provide a solid volume margin. So if a TV is bought for home viewing in a quiet, calm environment, you can not pay much attention to the sound power: it is guaranteed to be enough for such a usage. It makes sense to specifically look for models with high-power speakers for a noisy environment — for example, a cafe or other public space. Detailed recommendations on this matter can be found in special sources, but here we note that even in such cases, connecting external speakers can be a good alternative.

Number of speakers

The number of speakers installed in the TV.

Theoretically, one speaker is enough to work with sound, but most entry-level and mid-range models (as well as many premium devices) provide two speakers — for stereo operation, which allows to achieve some surround sound effect. And more than two speakers usually means the TV has enhanced audio capabilities such as a subwoofer or soundbar (see below).

Power consumption

The electrical power normally consumed by the TV. This parameter strongly depends on the screen size and sound power (see above), however, it can be determined by other parameters — primarily additional features and technologies implemented in the design. It is worth noting that most modern LCD TVs are quite economical, and most often this parameter does not play a significant role — in most cases, power consumption is about several tens of watts. And even large models with a diagonal of 70 – 90" consume about 200 – 300 W — this can be compared with the system unit of a low-power desktop PC.
Samsung QE-65QN85D often compared
Samsung QE-65QN95D often compared