Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 205/50 R17 93H Audi
 |
 |
Close
Choose Size tyre
We recommend products in stockTyres Bridgestone →
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 205/50 R17 93H Audi | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Bridgestone 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Bridgestone.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Bridgestone 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Bridgestone.
How to Choose Summer TiresIn this tyres review we will tell you about main criteria to consider when choosing the right summer tyres for your car
Subsidiary brands of leading tyre companiesTyres from sub-brands have the same qualities as the products of the parent companies
Model overview based on user reviews
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 tires are highly regarded for their performance in various winter conditions. Users appreciate their excellent grip on snow and ice, making them reliable for winter driving. The tires are noted for their softness and quiet ride, even at higher speeds on cobblestones or highways. They perform well in slush and water, providing stability and safety. However, some users mention that they may struggle slightly with starting on ice and deep snow, suggesting they are best suited for urban environments and cleared roads. Overall, the tires are praised for their quality, reasonable price, and suitability for a calm, mild European winter.
Pros
Cons
0 3 1 4 |
Having traveled 7 years. The depth of doubt does not arise. Everyday people complain about the water and slush. Snow is a big problem. Guma inclusive for the great place and asphalt Snow is a big problem  Leon: |
I bought it in 2017 before winter, made in France, installed at the front. The town is small, the roads are poorly maintained, not to mention the private sector from which I usually departed. It grips excellently, on the highway too; at 110 km/h, I hit a big and "hard" pothole on the highway, a tiny bump appeared (it's repairable), before that I had hit potholes but had no bumps. Car KIA Cerato 2007 2.0 MT. I will buy two more new ones for this winter. It rows great, brakes great in the snow, you have to try hard to get stuck on it. Perhaps a soft sidewall, but with a fool you can... break it. use Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 205/55 R16 91H few months |
Coat but not-that. The manufacturer is well-known. Compacted snow+, hardly makes noise at 100 on the asphalt, not stiff. It's impossible to start moving without slipping; the slightest ice is a complicated problem. Driving is a complete nightmare. Before this, for 3 seasons, I had AMTEL NORDMASTER studded on the rear (I have a MERS-124 with a loaded trunk). I was the king of roads and off-road, but in three seasons, 3 tires lost the cord despite having excellent tread.  Aleks11-11: use Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 month or more |
3 out of 8 user review(s) shown
5 more user review(s)
Video reviews
Honda Civic Si with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32's vs. Hill at a dead Stop
23 February 20177 470 view
Brigstone Blizzak LM-32 Snow Tire Review - Amazing Winter Tires!
30 November 20212 069 view